Monday 29 August 2022

TUV fails in an attempt to block bid of hosting a cross-community event of the international Irish Trade festival

A proposal by the undemocratic TUV to snub the festival at Ards and North Down Borough Council has failed to win any support. 
       Unionism and loyalism have been           attacking the Irish language for a very        long time especially since the famous       crocodile speech by former DUP leader                            Arlene Foster 
A TUV attempt to snub a bid for an Irish trad music festival in the North of Ireland has been stopped in its tracks by fellow unionists. 

In Ards and North Down Borough Council this week, TUV Councillor Stephen Cooper tried to stop a letter of support being issued from the council to Belfast City Council and Ards Comhaltas Ceoltóirí Éireann who are making a bid to host the Fleadh Cheoil na Éireann. Despite the letter of support being recommended by Ards and North Down officials, the TUV councillor said the council should only "note" and not support the recommendation. 
    TUV: And Jim Allister have no policies        they spread only hate and negatively               within their own communities 

He cited the controversy over the West Belfast Féile An Phobail (Oh ahh up the RA) earlier this month - in which certain audience members chanted republican slogans during a Wolfe Tones concert - as a reason for not supporting the bid to host the Irish Trad festival. 


One of the biggest festivals of traditional Irish culture in the world, Fleadh Cheoil na Éireann attracts tens of thousands of international visitors each year. In its 60-year history the festival has only been held once in the North of Ireland, in Co Derry in 2013.

Ards Comhaltas Ceoltóirí Éireann, a cross-community non profit organisation promoting and fostering Irish traditional music, song and dance in the Ards area, has joined with Belfast City Council to make a bid for the festival, with no "Oh Ahh up the RA" to be seen anywhere. And BCC has asked Ards and North Down local authority to give added weight to the bid with a formal letter, with a view to events being held in Newtownards and Bangor. 

The Ards and North Down Council report states: "Belfast City Council believes this event will hugely compliment Belfast's UNESCO City of Music status. The final bid is in the process of being finalised and includes reference to Bangor and Ards. 

"If Belfast City Council were successful in securing the event, follow up meetings with Ards and North Down could benefit from this event." 

However, Councillor Cooper told the full meeting of Ards and North Down Borough Council this week: "In light of the recent disgraceful scenes at the West Belfast, I don't want to give any opportunity for a repeat of the glorification of terrorism. 

"On a more pragmatic level, this is more about Belfast City, and bolstering their attempts at this. We don't really get any benefit from it, and the language around it is on an all-island basis, which obviously as a unionist I find objectionable." 

      Unionist: Culture and Tradition the.                         clues in the picture 

He said the opinions of other parties were "rather naive" and said Ards and North Down Borough Council had "a history of intolerance to unionist traditions". He added: "One only has to look across the province, and the deliberate attempt at diminishing our expressions of culture. 

"That's not to say this is tit for tat, or this is in any way retaliatory, (them and us) because it is not. The lack of information here is a major objection, as we don't know what this is, and whether we are going to be involved at all." 

He was supported on his proposal by three Independent Unionist elected representatives, and one DUP councillor. 26 councillors, from the DUP, Alliance, the UUP, the Green Party, the SDLP, and one independent, voted against the TUV proposal. A counter proposal to carry the recommendation and support the bid for the festival was passed by 26 to five. 

Ards and North Down Borough Council has a thinly weighted unionist majority, with 40 elected representatives, 21 from unionist parties or unionist independents, the other 19 from Alliance, the Green Party, the SDLP and one independent. There is only one nationalist councillor in the chamber of 40 - the smallest representation of all 11 councils in the North of Ireland. 

Alliance Councillor Hannah Irwin told the chamber: "In terms of Ards CCE itself, know a lot of the members of the group are residents, Good friends of mine in the borough. It would be great if we could support our residents on behalf of NI." 

DUP Alderman Stephen Mcilveen said:  "Certainly neither Ards CCE nor the Fleadh have had issues of controversy about them. We tread a dangerous line if we are talking about the West Belfast Festival and the shameful activities there, and then tar all events with that particular brush. 

"We would then be saying if this happens here, then we have to punish everybody who seeks to celebrate their culture. It may not be something I would take part in, but I am not going to deny other people that." 

UUP councillor Philip Smith said: "If you look at the statistics around this event - it is a major international event. You are talking around half a million people over 10 days, £50 million income into the economy, and 25 percent of those visitors are coming from outside the island of Ireland. 

"The only time it took place in the North of Ireland was in 2013 in Co Derry, and I remember at the time Lambeg and flute bands participated on the City side and the Waterside. So there is a lot of potential there for inclusion. I have been to the concerts of Ards CCE before, and I know the excellent work they do, and I think we should encourage that." 

SDLP councillor Joe Boyle said: "I hear about Unionism being threatened by this, and I think it is really pitiful. I am surprised that the lights didn't go out when we heard that, because you would have thought the world was going to fall in. 

"This is basically music, this is basically dance, this is basically trying to bring something to our borough that spins off from Belfast, and all it costs us is a letter of support." 

With many thanks to: Belfast Live and Michael Kenwood Local democracy reporter for the original publication. 

Follow these stories: 

Unionist-dominated Ulster is over: Are we on a demographic march towards Irish reunification?

Major demographic consequences of the Troubles are the brain drain from all communities and the reinforcement of voluntary segregation
     Brendan O'Leary: 'Irish reunification            was long deemed impossible. For                              many it still is'. 
            Saturday Aug 27th, 2022. 
6 into 26 won’t go! I saw that painted on a Belfast gable wall when I was a boy. Being a competitive little lad I thought the graffiti author didn’t understand fractions. After all six goes into 26 “four and a third times”. Of course, the statement was not about division, where it may have been correct according to certain schoolteachers, but about partition.

The six counties of the North of Ireland could not, would not, and should not fit into the 26 counties of the Republic of Ireland. Monarchist, Protestant, English-speaking people could not live in the Republican, Catholic and Gaelic nation-state. The statement was a slogan – a word derived from the Irish for “war cry”. It proclaimed an “impossibility”.

           A United Ireland is Inevitable 

Irish reunification was long deemed impossible. For many it still is, especially because of the long conflict – or war or “Troubles” – between 1966 and 2005, or 1968 and 1998. The dates and names are contested. Yet reunification is now certainly possible, indeed highly probable, though not inevitable – at least, not yet.

But even those who want it to happen are not prepared – at least not adequately prepared, even if they may think otherwise. That includes Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael, Sinn Féin, the SDLP, the Irish Labour Party, the Greens, People Before Profit and others.

The Government of Ireland Act of 1920, the instrument of partition enacted by the Westminster parliament, was the most enduring gerrymander of the last century. With some truculence Ulster unionists accepted a six-county Northern Ireland rather than one consisting of all nine counties of Ulster. Their local leaders had made a strategic decision. In the words of James Craig, Northern Ireland’s first prime minister, they would secure those counties they could control, and thereby create “a new and impregnable Pale”, behind which loyalists could withdraw and regroup to maintain the union with Great Britain.



That control has now been lost, however. The ramparts of the new Pale are long gone. Unionist control went in 1972 when the London government shut down the Northern Ireland parliament, which the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) had dominated for 50 years. The ramparts were the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC), the armed police force, and the B Specials, its armed reserve. The former was mostly Protestant; the latter, originally recruited from the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF), entirely Protestant.
    PSNI: They'll always be the RUC to me 

The most famous Ulster unionist slogan is “no surrender”, still cried at the annual August and December parades of the Apprentice Boys over Derry’s walls – or Londonderry’s. The “boys” are nowadays mostly somewhat-matured men. The slogan means no surrender either to Irish Catholics or to illegitimate British power.

There have, however, been several unionist surrenders – as well as British betrayals. Ulster unionists parted with their Southern counterparts, who wanted all of Ireland to remain in the United Kingdom, or in the British empire or in the British Commonwealth. Southern unionists would have settled for “dominion status” for the entire island in 1917–18 so that they would have been part of a larger minority rather than the small one they became. They feared an Irish Republic, but they did not want partition. Ulster unionists preferred to leave Southern unionists behind rather than bolster them in a sovereign united Ireland. As retreating generals do, they cut their losses.

Ulster unionists had made a solemn covenant on “Ulster Day” in September 1912. In it they pledged loyalty to their brothers and sisters throughout Ulster. The covenant was signed by more than 235,000 men, with a matching declaration signed by nearly the same number of women. The three counties of Donegal, Cavan and Monaghan, however, had large Catholic and nationalist majorities. A nine-county Ulster would have meant, according to the census of 1911, a Protestant-to-Catholic ratio of 57 to 43 rather than the 66-to-34 ratio of what became Northern Ireland.

The UUP leadership’s “inner circle” effectively surrendered the unionists of Donegal, Cavan and Monaghan to what became the Irish Free State. They might have had all of Ulster, and kept to their covenant, but then their demographic and electoral majority would have been highly unstable, and quickly reversible.

The British coalition government of 1918–22, made up of Conservative unionists and Liberal imperialists, and led by David Lloyd George, organised Ulster’s “downsizing”. The Ulster unionist elite were effectively allowed to pick their preferred Northern Ireland: six counties, four with cultural Protestant and unionist majorities – Antrim, Down, Armagh and Londonderry – and two without – Fermanagh and Tyrone. Unofficially unionists would call these six counties Ulster. Officially UK governments refused requests to rename Northern Ireland as Ulster, but they had no objections to the naming of the Royal Ulster Constabulary, or later to the Ulster Defence Regiment, or to “the Ulster Banner”.
       The North (Ulster) was originally            made-up of 9 Counties but unionists            dropped 3 of the Counties, leaving                  the north as the 6 Counties 

Unionist-dominated Ulster is now over. A referendum in the North on Irish unity is likely at the end of this decade, to be followed by one in the South if the rules of the Good Friday Agreement of 1998 are followed. That is because Northern Ireland’s tectonic plates have shifted. Its cultural Catholic population – those who are Catholic or come from a predominantly Catholic family formation – now outnumber cultural Protestants.

Since the last quarter of the 19th century such Catholics have mostly voted for nationalist parties with platforms that favour an autonomous or independent and united Ireland. Today the largest of these parties are Sinn Féin and the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP). Not everyone who votes Sinn Féin or SDLP will vote for Irish reunification if and when the Northern referendum happens. Like everyone with a vote they will want to know what is on offer and what the benefits and costs are, both for themselves and their families and for their peoples. But cultural Catholics will have a choice, and their votes will matter – with increasingly decisive importance over the rest of this decade. By 2030, as I shall try to show, the decision will be theirs to make.

The Alliance Party and the Greens, which refuse to register as either nationalists or unionists, and who identify as “others”, also have significant cultural Catholic members and voters; perhaps a majority have that background. Many of these voters will strongly feel the appeal of Irish reunification in a referendum, as will a distinct minority of liberal Protestants who identify with Alliance or the Greens.
   Religious identity in the North of Ireland 

Look at the graphic above, which contains a series of figures. The lines on the graph show the percentages of the local population of the Six Counties who identify as Catholic, Protestant and other Christian, other religions, or as “no religion”, or “not stated”, or “none” over the 150 years since the first regular census. The black bar across the middle marks the 50 per cent line. It is easy to see that the proportion of Catholics in the Six Counties fell before partition in 1920 – partly because Catholics out-migrated from a hostile Belfast region.

It is also easy to see that the proportion of Protestants peaked around the second World War. By 2011, however, Catholics were poised to surpass Protestants in raw numbers, and as this book goes to press almost certainly did so in the past decade. Today, a century after Northern Ireland’s invention, its founders’ descendants can no longer hold it on the strength of their own numbers.

This change has not occurred because Catholics quickly managed to “breed” at the rate popes are said to recommend, while Protestants did not. Catholics had a higher average birth rate than Protestants, but that did not matter before 1971–81. Under the domination of the Ulster Unionist Party in the old Stormont parliament between 1920 and 1972, life was significantly more unpleasant, on average, for Catholics than it was for Protestants. And deliberately so. As David Trimble put it, when accepting the Nobel Peace Prize at Oslo with John Hume in December 1998, “Ulster unionists, fearful of being isolated on the island, built a solid house, but it was a cold house for Catholics”.

Catholics emigrated from this cold house far more than Protestants, proportionally and absolutely. Trimble continued: “Northern nationalists, although they had a roof over their heads, seemed to us as if they meant to burn the house down.” Whether these fears of combustion were justified, and whether they remain so, is the subject of unresolved controversy. What did end eventually was disproportional Catholic out-migration.

The demographic ratios of the two major groupings changed slowly after 1972, partly because comparative rates of migration changed. Educational reforms by the post-war Labour government in London created a graduate class of Catholics by the 1960s that would spearhead the Northern Ireland civil rights movement. Political reforms made a difference, eventually, after the imposition of direct rule by Great Britain in 1972.

So did the MacBride campaign, begun among the Irish diaspora in the United States under the auspices of the former Irish foreign minister Seán MacBride, which begat the Fair Employment (Northern Ireland) Act of 1989, enacted by Margaret Thatcher’s government to replace the failed act of the same name of 1976. The draft bill was effectively redrafted by Belfast-born legal scholar Prof Christopher McCrudden, then lead adviser on law to Kevin McNamara MP, the British Labour Party’s frontbench spokesman on Northern Ireland. The Fair Employment Act proved to be remarkably effective legislation. Among other accomplishments it made cultural Catholics more likely to stay in the North of Ireland.

Did unionists lose their demographic majority for reasons beyond those of a partly reformed and therefore better North of Ireland, higher Catholic birth rates, and eventually lower Catholic migration? Other factors have also been suggested.

Protestants have been more likely to leave to take university degrees in Great Britain – and not return – especially when university tuition was free. It is a plausible story, but it is difficult to estimate the flows and their endurance. What is clear is that Northern universities have cultural Catholic pluralities or majorities in their student bodies.

Another suggestion is that unionists left disproportionally because of the war officially launched by the Provisional IRA in 1971. That explanation is also difficult to evaluate, and faces a decisive objection: more Catholics died than Protestants in the conflict, proportionally and absolutely, and more violence and injuries took place in Catholic-majority districts of the North of Ireland. So if violence induced emigration then, at the margin, Catholics should have been more likely to leave than Protestants. Many Catholics did leave because of violence by the B Specials, the RUC, the Ulster Defence Regiment, the British army, and loyalist militia, as well as violence by republicans on their front doorsteps.

Whatever one’s opinions on these contested matters, the two most powerful demographic consequences of the conflict, euphemistically known as “the Troubles”, are agreed: the brain drain from all communities; and the reinforcement of voluntary segregation, sometimes because of intimidation. People with skills and higher-education qualifications were more likely to leave, and people who stayed became even more likely to live with their own. Mixed areas became unmixed. Sometimes they were forcibly unmixed. Some remixing is now taking place after 25 years of peace.

With many thanks to the: Irish Times and Brendan O’Leary for the original publication. 

Follow these links to find out more on this story: DUP being allowed to scatter Good Friday Agreement to the winds.



Extracted from Making Sense of a United Ireland, Should it Happen, How Might it Happen? by Brendan O’Leary, published by Sandycove on September 1st at €25.00.

Saturday 27 August 2022

SICK ASSAULT | Ex-Sinn Féin councillor put on sex offenders register after sex attack on bar worker on stag party.

Ex-Sinn Féin councillor put on sex offenders register after sex attack on bar worker on stag party
                  Cathal McLaughlin 
            Saturday 27th August, 2022. 
A former Sinn Fein councillor who sexually assaulted a bar worker while on a stag night in Edinburgh city centre has been placed on the sex offenders register.

Cathal McLaughlin grabbed the waitress and touched her buttocks while was she serving him and his friends drinks at a pub in the Scottish capital in October last year.

McLaughlin (60) denied the sex attack and claimed he was only pulling the woman closer to him as he could not hear what she was saying to him.
But CCTV played to the court during his trial showed the ex-politician sexually assaulting the staff member by touching her up during his drunken night out.

McLaughlin, from Cloughmills, Co Antrim, stood trial at Edinburgh Sheriff Court last month and was back in the dock for sentencing today.

McLaughlin’s defence agent said the shamed councillor has the “support of his family” and that he has made “a positive contribution within his community” since being elected in 2010.

The court was told McLaughlin had resigned from Sinn Fein following his conviction and the social work report has deemed him to be “a low risk of reoffending”.

The lawyer added the first offender faces “serious implications” due to the nature of the offence of which he was convicted.

In sentencing, Sheriff Donald Corke said: “You were found guilty after trial on a summary complaint of sexual assault on a date in October 2021.

“You touched a female bar supervisor on the buttock over her clothing. You had taken a lot of drink but that is no excuse.

“However, I take into account your lack of previous convictions and that you have damaged your standing within the community.

“You have also incurred the expense of repeatedly coming to court from Northern Ireland.

“You do, however, have an apparent difficulty in seeing how a young woman can react negatively to unwanted touching in a bar.

“This case will hopefully send a message to you and others that such casual assaults will not be tolerated.”

Sheriff Corke placed McLaughlin on the sex offenders register and on a supervision order for the next six months.

Following his conviction, Sinn Fein said it had expelled McLaughlin from the party, for which he represented the area of Ballymoney on Causeway Coast and Glens Borough Council.

A spokesperson said: “Sinn Fein has written to Councillor Cathal McLaughlin upon receipt of information that he has been convicted in a Scottish court of a serious criminal offence.

“Our thoughts are with the victim of this serious crime of sexual assault.”

The spokesperson added that McLaughlin failed to notify the party that he was subject to “criminal proceedings”.

They said: “Given the severity of the offence, his membership of Sinn Fein is terminated with immediate effect.”

A spokesperson for Causeway Coast and Glens Borough Council said: “[The council] can confirm that Cathal McLaughlin resigned from his position on July 23, 2022.”

McLaughlin previously served on the old Ballymoney Borough Council before being co-opted on to Causeway Coast and Glens Borough Council in 2016 to replace Philip McGuigan, following his election to the Assembly.

At the time of his 2016 co-option, McLaughlin said: "It is a honour to be selected to represent the people of North Antrim as a councillor.

"I will aim to build on the good work of Philip McGuigan and work for the people of North Antrim and across the constituency."

Upon his co-option to the council to serve the Ballymoney district electoral area, McLaughlin said his priorities would include developing a campaign to reduce speed limits in areas where there are vulnerable people and children, and also addressing the “disparity” of the clearing of roads in the winter in Ballymoney, compared to other areas.

Speaking to the Belfast Telegraph previously, McLaughlin said: "I am totally innocent of what I have been accused of and will be appealing. I didn't inform the party of the case as I was assured nothing would come of it.”

With many thanks to the: Sunday World and Alexander Lawrie, Belfast Telegraph for the original story. 

Follow these links to find out more on this story: Sinn Féin expels Councillor convicted of serious criminal offence


Friday 26 August 2022

REJECTED | UVF suspect fails in bail bid after admitting having two kilos of cocaine for distribution

UVF suspect fails in bail bid after admitting having two kilos of cocaine for distribution.
     East Belfast UVF: UVF suspect Colin.                         Joseph Garrett 

             Friday, 26 August 2022
An east Belfast loyalist has confessed to having two kilos of cocaine for distribution.

Colin Joseph Garrett “accepts the headline charge” of having the class A drug with intent to supply, but a court was told he still wanted to apply for bail due to the time spent on remand.

                   East Belfast UVF 

“He has served the equivalent of an almost two-year sentence,” a defence lawyer said, “so the foundation of the application is that he is, or is almost, time served”.

He confirmed that Garrett, who appeared in court by video-link from prison alongside his co-accused David Ghent, was admitting both having the cocaine with intent and simple possession.

But Newtownards Magistrates Court on Wednesday was told “there maybe one issue” with a further charge of simple possession of class B cannabis.

Ordering a pre-sentence report to be completed and for that to be sent to the Crown Court judge who will ultimately deal with the case, District Judge Mark Hamill said the class B count “will hardly hold matters up.”

Ballybeen loyalist Garrett, from Craigleith Drive in Dundonald, faces three charges including possessing cocaine, having the class A drug with intent to supply and simple possession of class B cannabis.

The offences are alleged to have been committed on November 24 last year.
      Suspected East Belfast UVF member                     Colin Joseph Garrett 

His co-accused, taxi driver David John Ghent (42), from Hollyfields in Dungannon, faces five charges including possessing cocaine, having the class A drug with intent to supply, supplying cocaine, importing cocaine and possessing criminal property on the same date.

Previous courts have been told police believe Garrett is a wholesale drugs distributor for the UVF in east Belfast, while Ghent is alleged to have links to organised crime gangs in Dublin and had brought the cocaine over the border.

The charges against them arise following a police operation both at Garrett’s home and in Moira when Ghent was stopped and searched.

Previous courts have heard that when Ghent pulled up outside Garrett’s house, the east Belfast man went out and collected a package from the taxi which then drove off.

Garrett went back inside but was swiftly followed by a police search team. The 29-year-old ran upstairs and hurled the package from an upstairs bedroom window but unbeknownst to him, cops has been lying in wait at the rear and they were able to retrieve the package which contained 2.24 kilos of cocaine.

Meanwhile as Ghent approached Moira, his taxi was pulled over and searched with a further one kilo package of cocaine retrieved.

Cops have said that with a value up to £180,000, the seizures represent “an enormous hit” on a cross-border drug smuggling operation involving both organised crime gangs in the south as well as east Belfast paramilitaries.

The judge adjourned the case for a week, but refused to grant bail to Garrett, commenting that “this is a noxious mixture of paramilitaries, organised crime and drugs.”

With many thanks to the: Sunday World and Paul Higgins Sunday Life for the original story. 



Wednesday 24 August 2022

MI5 and MI6 accused of tip-off that led to torture in Jagtar Singh Johal case

MI5 and MI6 stand accused of tipping off the Indian authorities about a Scottish citizen before his abduction and alleged torture by Punjab police. 

Jagtar Singh Johal, from Dombarton in Scotland, was in India in 2017 when his family say he was kidnapped and forced into an unmarked car. 

He says he was then tortured over days, including with electrocution. He has remained in custody since then for now over seven years. 

Successive British prime ministers have raised his case but Indian's government denies he was tortured or mistreated. 

Mr Johal was an active blogger and campaigner for Sikh human rights, which are said to have brought him to the attention of the Indian authorities. 

In May, he was formerly charged with conspiracy to commit murder and being a member of a terrorist gang. He will be presented with a full list of the charges against him next month and faces a possible death penalty. 

The Indian authorities say the charges are related to Sikh nationalism, though he denies any wrongdoing. 

Now the human rights group Reprieve has shown the BBC documentation that it says is compelling evidence that his arrest followed a tip-off from British Intelligence Services. 

The UK Government says it will not comment on an ongoing legal case. 
Reprieve says it has matched several details relating to his case to a specific claim of mistreatment documented in a report by the watchdog that overseas the intelligence agencies. 

"In the course of an investigation", says the Investigatory Powers Commissioner's Office (IPCO) report, "MI5 passed intelligence to a liaison partner via the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6). 

"The subject of the intelligence was arrested by the liaison partner in their country. The individual told the British Consular Official that he had been tortured." 

Mr Johal is not named in the report, but Reprieve's investigators are adamant the facts match his case due to the dates concerned, the lobbying by British prime ministers and 

Mr Johal is currently being held in a Delhi prison. He has alleged that, following his arrest, he was held incommunicado, was brutally interrogated for hours on end, and was initially denied access to lawyers or British consular officials. 

He says he was made to sign blank sheets of paper that were later used against him as a false confession. 

Prime Minister Boris Johnson said he raised Mr Johal's case with his Indian counterpart, Narendra Modi, during a trip to India in April this year. His predecessor, Theresa May, also raised the case with the Indian government during her tenure. 
     Jagtar Singh Johal (right) arrives at.           court in India in November 2017

On 12th August, Mr Johal lodged a claim in the High Court against the Foreign Office, the Home Office and the Attorney General, alleging that UK Intelligence agencies unlawfully shared information with the Indian authorities when there was a risk he could be tortured. 

Reprieve says this case suggests the government has failed to fix longstanding shortcomings in its policy on torture and the death penalty, and has learned little from past failings such as the MI6 tip-off that led to the rendition and torture of Lybyan dissident Abdulhakim Belhaj. 

Commenting on the allegations, MP Steve Baker said: "This appalling case, where UK intelligence sharing has been linked to brutal torture, illustrates vividly why the National Security Bill needs to be improved." 

Responding on behalf of all three accused government departments, the Foreign Office said: "It would be inappropriate to comment on an ongoing legal case."

With many thanks to BBC News London for the original story. 

Follow these links to find out more on this story: Scott held in India faces murder conspiracy charge
















Tuesday 23 August 2022

Suspected device recovered by police investigating the activities of the West Belfast UDA

East Belfast security alert: Two arrests and suspicious object removed by police investigating the activities of the West Belfast UDA 
   The scene on Dee Street in east Belfast      yesterday following the discovery of a.                      suspected device 

Two people have been arrested under the Terrorism Act by police investigating activities linked to the West Belfast UDA following a security alert in east Belfast. 

A proactive search by police in the Dee Street area on Monday afternoon saw police locate a suspected device, when the bomb squad were called in prompting the closure of the road to motorists while it was removed for forensic examination after being "made safe". 

Officers from the PSNI's Paramilitary Crime Task Force, investigating the activities of the West Belfast UDA, also found a quantity of suspected Class B drugs during the search. 

A man aged 31 and a woman aged 33 were arrested under the Terrorism Act, and both remained in police custody late last night. 

      Local residents stand outside of the            cordon on the Lower Newtownards             Road as Army Technical Officers                (ATO) on Dee Street, Belfast, use a            robot to check vehicles during the.                              security alert. 

A PSNI/RUC spokesperson said two further linked searches of properties took place in east and south Belfast, during which a small quantity of suspected Class B drugs were seized along with electronic items. 

Dee Street was reopened to motorists yesterday evening. 

With many thanks to: The Irish News for the original story. 

How Brexit and a blundering leader of the DUP and his party have ensured the Union's days may well be truly numbered

A UNITED IRELAND IS INEVITABLE 

THE Union is under threat like never before. A LucidTalk  poll shows 57% of 18-24-year-olds want Irish Unity with just 35% opting to remain as part of the UK. 
Among those aged 25-44, it's 48% to 42%. 

The writing is on the wall, although some are too blind to see it. 

THE writing is on the wall for the future of the Union, but those for whom preserving it matters most are just too blind to see it. 
If there was a border poll tomorrow, 48% of people here would vote to remain in the United Kingdom and 41% would choose Irish unity, with 11% undecided. But that's not the figure that should scare those who seek to maintain the status quo. 

With many thanks to the: Belfast Telegraph/Sunday Life and Suzanne Breen for the original publication 




Monday 22 August 2022

'ANNUAL AMNESIA' | 'The annual outrage over the band’s chorus raised some serious questions about sectarianism’

Has there ever been a more terrifying slogan than ‘ooh, ah up the RA?’

Nothing strikes fear more than a chant which starts with ‘ooh ah.’

         Sunday 21st August, 2022. 

‘Ooh ah, it hasn’t gone away you know’
     People walk past Irish language rap            group Kneecap'mural of a burning.              police Land Rover on Hawthorn             Street in Belfast. There have. been calls.      for political leadership after a series of              incidents across the weekend,             including pro-IRA chants at a concert.       in west Belfast. The Wolfe Tones                  played their annual gig to close Feile.              an Phobail in west Belfast on                    Sunday evening. Picture: Liam.                      McBurney/PA Wire — © PA

The only thing scarier than the Wolfe Tones Celtic Symphony is Aqua’s Death to Barbie Girl or ABBA’s The Shinner Takes It All.

The annual outrage over the band’s chorus raised some serious questions about sectarianism, because to paraphrase Gerry Adams infamous 1995 speech, ‘ooh ah, it hasn’t gone away you know.’

Although footage from the concert – held during Feile but not publicly funded – was like watching a big bunch of teenagers get excited at hearing granny swearing. If any of them had experienced much of what the RA got up to, they’d probably have soiled their Under Armour.

After the gig the Tones 76-year-old lead singer Brian Warfield claimed the DUP were just being cranky when it called the event a ‘hate fest’.

No, the party knows an own goal when it sees one, and this one is served up on a plate every year, overshadowing the amazing events which make up the rest of Feile.

The party also develops sudden annual amnesia about the Belfast City Council funding for Feile which it enthusiastically embraces because your lot are getting this pile of cash and our lot are getting that pile of cash.

And every year it sparks an outbreak of ‘whataboutery’ not helped on this occasion by the Derry bonfire with pictures of the Queen, Paras flags and poppy wreaths. Because the way to address feeling disrespected by Twelfth bonfires with Irish tricolours and effigies of politicians is to carefully consider it and then do exactly the same thing.

Kneecap’s unveiling of a burning police jeep mural prior to their Feile gig was just a baffling throwback. Their fans are more likely to be worried about where their next Nike Air Max are coming from, but the clue to the band’s brand is in the name.

In the Wolfe Tones furore, the Charity Commission and Tourism Ireland have been dragged in to see if they should be taking action. Somewhere there’s a civil servant asking how come fixing sectarianism in a society blighted by years of division and violence is their problem.

The real words of wisdom came from Bishop Donal McKeown in response to the Derry bonfire who pointed out that ‘sectarianism actually benefits tribalism on the part of large parties.’

If we’re going to set a terrible example to our young people, we can’t then condemn them for copying what previous generations have done.

And the worst thing is I’m now agreeing with a bishop.

With many thanks to the: Sunday World and Roisin Gorman for the original story. 

Follow these links to find out more on this story: West Belfast Féile at eye of summer storm

UPROAR: Teenagers singing "Oh Ah Up The RA". SILENCE: Teenagers and children marching in UVF uniforms commemorating a UVF murderer the children can be seen clearly 'Glorifying UVF Terrorism'!!!

            THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE!!!  

          BUT THIS IS ACCEPTED AND
          SEEN AS PART OF THE NORM
         WITHIN THE PUL COMMUNITY 

'BLACKMAIL PLOT' | Two members of the West Belfast UDA are accused of threatening to shoot victim and his family if he didn’t pay £5,000

Forensic tests on cigarette butts at the scene uncovered their respective DNA profile
         Stephen McLaughlin (left) and                               Jonathan Sterling 

Two alleged UDA gangsters have been ordered to stand trial accused of a loyalist blackmail plot.

Stephan McLaughlin (40) and Jonathan Sterling (36) are both charged with blackmail and appeared in person and stood side-by-side in court in Antrim last week.
                   West Belfast UDA 

It’s alleged that in November last year, they demanded £5,000 “with menaces” from their alleged victim.

At one stage during the hearing Sterling had to be told by the judge to take “his hands out of his pockets’’, opting instead to stand with his arms folded over his grey tracksuit.

Previous hearings have heard claims that the victim was in his Antrim home when he answered the door to two men who told him he had 48 hours to cough up £5,000 to the UDA or either he, or his family, would be shot.

In an exchange captured on CCTV, McLaughlin and Sterling allegedly told the complainant they had been sent by an unnamed man who “is the west Belfast UDA”.

A police officer outlined how the victim had also been told that “if they couldn’t get him then they would harm his family.”

He further claimed that during an exchange at the front door, he asked the men what the money was for, but was told to “never mind what for.”

“The victim made a reference to another third party from the Shankill Road and said he would contact that person by phone… and ask him about this to which the defendants said, ‘Who do you think sent us’,” said the detective.

“The victim has gone on to ask has this third party sent you or is it west Belfast UDA to which the defendant McLaughlin said this third party ‘is the west Belfast UDA’.”

At one stage, McLaughlin received a phone call and the victim has claimed he recognised the voice of the “third party” talking on the other end before he and Sterling exchanged phone numbers.

The court heard that when the men were leaving, the man asked them “where will I get £5,000 from” and was told “we don’t give a f*** where you get it — just get it.”

It was also said that the alleged victim “has identified the males as two individuals that he has known from the Shankill Road area of Belfast” while forensic tests on cigarette butts at the scene uncovered their respective DNA profiles.

Belfast men McLaughlin, from Columbia Street, and Sterling, from the West Circular Road, denied involvement during police interviews.

But during the brief hearing at Ballymena courthouse on Tuesday, their defence solicitors agreed there was a prima facie case against the alleged extortionists.

Both men were told that although not obliged to, they had the right to comment on the charge and to call evidence on their own behalves but they declined the opportunity.

Returning the case to Antrim Crown Court for trial, the judge freed the pair on continuing bail with their arraignment to be heard next month.

With many thanks to the: Sunday World and Paul Higgins (Sunday Life) for the original story.